×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Draft Comprehensive Plan

Commenting period open Monday, December 2nd, 2024 - Tuesday, January 21st, 2025

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…

Summary

All Hide

Welcome to the Draft Comprehensive Plan

Expand

Chapter I

The Cohesive Ketchum Comprehensive Plan: Provides background information related to the Cohesive Ketchum process, key issues that arose during the process, and how the Plan fits into the City’s existing operations.

Chapter II

Community Vision and Core Values: Reflects what is important to the community now and for the future.

Chapter III

Goals and Policies: Establishes overarching policy guidance on a range of topics, organized by core value. The goals and policies highlighted in this chapter will be used to guide day-to-day decision-making.

Chapter IV

Growth Framework: Includes information about factors influencing Ketchum’s growth and the Future Land Use Plan (which is made up of the Future Land Use Map and associated Land Use Category descriptions).

Chapter V

Implementation: Identifies priority actions for the next two- to four-years and serves as the City’s Playbook—bridging the gap between the Comp Plan and the more detailed annual work plan.

Chapter VI

Appendices: Contains a summary of major trends and existing conditions, a land demand and capacity analysis, and information related to Idaho property rights.

Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.


Suggestion
So Ketchum is willing to compromise long-time neighborhoods and turn them into duplexes and town homes? Increasing density will change the integrity of the neighborhood. What people once thought was a "cool" neighborhood will be gone.
replies
Suggestion
Then restrict size on newly built homes!!
replies
Suggestion
What historic preservation!?!? So many buildings from our past that made our town unique are gone. Our town is slowly disappearing, being replaced with boxes. How much more of our town can be replaced before it isn't our town anymore, before it isn't our home?
replies
Suggestion
Agree with William & Annie here... City needs to work with Hailey, Bellevue and the County for solutions to affordable/workforce housing. We do not need to be a town of Bluebirds...Let's see how one Bluebird settles into the fabric of Ketchum before starting another.
replies
Suggestion
Definitely need to add another circle "Honoring our historic past"!!
replies
Suggestion
Here you state that the last decade has seen substantial increase in population and new development which have escalated issues such as workforce housing, Ketchum's character, vitality & vibrancy.... so WHY is the City encouraging more growth for the future? We should not be increasing land density zoning, but maintaining and making sure that our resources can meet our demands. More people will require more workforce. We need to slow down, take a breath, see how things settle, see how climate change is going to affect us. Our town is slowly disappearing, being replaced. How much more of a neighborhood can be replaced before it isn't our neighborhood anymore, before it isn't our home? These losses are happening so quickly to Ketchum, it feels like all at once, not slowly. Please don't let Ketchum become what has happened to so many towns across the country that have promoted growth over vibrancy.
replies
Suggestion
Please let's work together to list the buildings identified in the two surveys as historic and that have been destroyed. It's important for us to quantify the work.
replies
Suggestion
We discussed in the HPC Jan 2025 meeting how to better present this info. Needs a matrix. As is, it's not easy for the reader.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion
Please acknowledge the historic structures & uses and not permit development to simply roll over them.
replies
Suggestion

character stems from history; it doesn't come from anywhere else.
replies
Suggestion
Among the primary factors influencing growth is the assumption that the only positive economy is one that's growing. Instead, if we re-integrate the customary externalities of healthy natural environment and place economic value on historic preservation, then we stand a chance to sustain a healthy economy at its current size.
replies
Suggestion
would be good to list these critters consistently in either singular or plural form, rather than switching back & forth.
replies
Suggestion
Fire should be its own section, not just in the interface. or maybe change the name of the header to include fire.
replies
Question
where do you discuss fire?
replies
Suggestion
suggest re-ordering these in the order of importance: avalanche, landslide, then earthquake.
replies
Suggestion
without a caption here, you miss the opportunity to discuss philanthropy.
replies
Question
what is this photo trying to tell us?
replies
Suggestion
please name the fire.
replies
Suggestion
these guys deserve a caption, please.
replies
Suggestion
would be good to overlay your map of environmentally sensitive areas with the one for increased density.
replies
Question
Isolated? Do you mean: "distributed"?
replies
in reply to LEIF's comment
Suggestion
To Leif's point, the Valley is FULL of nationally recognized renewable energy experts. Cost is not the issue. Instead, it's our PUC & IPCO who resist the efforts.
replies
Suggestion

sorry, folks - renewables have achieved cost parity. your info is out of date. We can't use cost as an excuse for not incorporating renewables.
replies
Suggestion
this caption should mention WS Preserve.
replies
Suggestion
please cite the artist in this caption
replies
Suggestion
Basque culture would be relevant for a caption.
replies
Suggestion
sheep stats would be good in a caption.
replies
Suggestion
please make note in your captions when we're including images of historic buildings. this one is important because it's owned by the city and on the national register. let's not skip an opportunity for education, please.
replies
Suggestion
Careful please with the newly proposed density for the orange & brown areas immediately north of the Preserve. We went through A LOT of effort to preserve the area. Why would we introduce massive density adjacent?
replies
Suggestion
Caption please would describe how toursit (motels have a history) structures combine.
replies
Suggestion
a caption would be extremely beneficial here.
replies
in reply to Perry Boyle's comment
Suggestion
Thanks for weighing in Perry, but I'm pretty sure that's what the HPC does, with the support of P&Z, ISHS & City staff.
replies
Suggestion
would be good to add a sentence re the interplay of natural features & historic preservation. Ketchum's Chinatown along the bench is a prime example. Another is the site of the smelter at the mouth of WS.
replies
Suggestion
Let's add a section about the intersection of Dark Skies & historic preservation, please. the interplay should be obvious.
replies
in reply to Jakub Galczynski's comment
Suggestion
McAtee house was a victory for historic preservation. A fail would have been its disappearance. In Idaho, we balance preservation with personal property rights.
replies
Suggestion
thank you for noting the Handbook.
replies
Suggestion
My final comment at this “10th Hour” is that this needs more time for discussion and community questions and comments to be answered.
So many people were not aware of this project until the presentation at Limelight less than a week ago and there are still many who are not aware of the scope of this - people who live in these neighborhoods where the density impact would be HUGE.
This needs more public presentation where city priorities on the project would be presented & questions could be answered .
replies
Suggestion
extra space before the comma
replies
Suggestion
The buildings were destroyed; they weren't lost. Passive voice allows us to fantasize that we have no control over historic preservation when - in fact - we do. The City has a robust budget to support development & a paltry one to support historic preservation. Hiding behind the passive voice only highlights the City's unwillingness to dedicate bold resources for historic preservation.
replies
Suggestion
missed opportunity for a Hemingway quote when we lack a caption here.
replies
Suggestion
As it stands, these tables are not reader-friendly. As we discussed in the HPC meeting Jan 2025, it would be preferable to have a matrix with topics addressed.
replies
Suggestion
How great it would be to have a caption that described our skate park donated by the Atkinson family. One of our core values is philanthropy. Are you guys talking to Spur?
replies